To be, or not to be... (technical)


Filip Hric

13th May 2025

TO BE OR NOT TO BE (TECHNICAL)

Hey Reader!
There’s an ongoing debate in the QA world on whether it makes sense to get technical or not. I remember having a fairly heated debate on this last November at Agile Testing Days in Potsdam. My talk titled "Test like a developer, develop like a tester" argued that we should put the effort as testers to become experts in the software we test. And yes, that includes having a fair bit of developer knowledge.

Jason Arbon called this a "debate of our ancestors" and made some excellent arguments on why the more important question is asking whether you are adding value to the team or wasting everyone’s time. I agree a lot with his take. After all the real question is whether we are learning as testers, or comfortably sitting in the QA chair while industry keeps on moving and leaving us behind. If you are reading this newsletter, chances are you’re part of the first group ❤️


Blogposts, discussions, events

Testing email flows with Mailosaur

A short giude on how to test e2e flows that require an email to be opened. Code demonstration using Mailosaur.

Read more →

Webinar: Ensuring Uptime with Playwright

Join me and Checkly for a webinar next week, where me an Nica will show you how to write smarter Playwright tests and extend them beyond QA to production monitoring and automation.

Read more →

Vibe-coding tools showdown - which one is the best?

Few weeks ago, Jonathan Canales and I tested out different "vibe-coding tools" and scored them on different scales. Here’s a summary of our findings and a link to the livestream

Read more →


99 Cypress.io tips course

Level up your Cypress skills with bite-sized, practical tips that you can immediately apply to your testing workflow.


Filip Hric

Teaching testers about development, and developers about testing

filip@filiphric.sk, Senec, Slovakia 90301
Unsubscribe · Preferences

Filip Hric

Sign up for weekly tips on testing, development, and everything related. Unsubscribe anytime you feel like you had enough 😊

Read more from Filip Hric

Hello Reader, AI can generate code, arguably with a pretty decent quality. That’s not news anymore. The question that’s been forming in my head all week is different: how do we decide what should go into production? Writing code is not the hard part (arguably, it never was). The hard part is making sure the right code ships and the wrong code doesn’t. And right now, that selection problem is becoming the defining challenge of AI-assisted development. Last week has definitely showed this....

Hey Reader, If you’re reading this, chances are you care about quality. Coming from QA, I never stop looking at the apps I build and systems I use through the lens of quality. Now, with more and more code being written by AI, this question matters more than ever. Many people wonder whether AI is even capable of delivering quality. I think it is. Though it’s worth remembering that quality is multidimensional. You can always have more or less of it. When it comes to AI and specifically LLMs,...

Hey Reader, It’s been a while since I’ve issued a newsletter, but I’m hoping to get back on track. There are just so many interesting things happening in the world of IT that I want to share with you all. But I’ve decided to change my approach to writing this newsletter a little bit. In the past, my main goal was to come up with some idea or some thought and basically write a post. This put a lot of pressure on me and I never wanted to force myself into writing a newsletter when I had nothing...